Introduction Fluoroquinolones
are broad-spectrum antibiotics with concentration dependent bactericidal
activity. The mechanism by which they exert this effect is by binding
to and inhibiting topoisomerase II (DNA-gyrase) and topoisomerase IV.
These bacterial enzymes are responsible for the coiling and uncoiling
of DNA, which is needed for bacterial cell repair and replication.(1)
The classification
of the fluoroquinolones is somewhat informal and unstandardized, but it
does serve a clinical purpose to classify them by their spectrum of action
and indication. Often gatifloxacin and Moxifloxacin are put into the 4th
generation category, which would make trovafloxacin 5th generation. The
later generations of fluoroquinolones underwent structural changes in
order to improve their half-life, spectrum of activity and potential for
less resistance. The addition of a methoxy- group in the R8 position (gatifloxacin
and moxifloxacin) increases the binding affinity for topoisomerase II
and IV, which increases the activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae
and helps prevent resistance to all susceptible bacteria. A fluorine in
the R8 position increases the potential for phototoxicity (Lomefloxacin,
Sparfloxacin).(1,12-13) The maximum
concentration (Cmax) is important because the fluoroquinolones' effectiveness
is concentration-dependent. It has been shown that in order for bacteria
to be highly susceptible to the fluoroquinolones and prevent resistant
mutants, the Cmax must be 10 times that of the MIC when treating gram-positive
bacteria. To calculate it another way, for gram-negative organisms the
AUC-to-MIC ratio desired is greater than 125; for gram-positive organisms
the AUC-to-MIC ratio should be at least 30.(14)
Adjustment is required for ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin,
ofloxacin and sparfloxacin when creatinine clearance is less than 50ml/min.
Noroxin adjustment is required when creatinine clearance is less than
30 ml/min.
This section highlights some of the more significant drug interactions. It is not an inclusive list. ANTACIDS AND OTHER MINERAL CONTAINING COMPOUNDS: This is a class effect for the fluoroquinolones. When taken in conjunction with cations such as aluminum, magnesium, calcium, iron and zinc their absorption is severely impaired. Ciprofloxacin absorption has been shown to be 90% less absorbed. NSAIDS: When NSAIDs are taken with the fluoroquinolones, CNS side effects (insomnia, nervousness and seizures) are increased. It is thought this action is due to the displacement of GABA from its receptor. THEOPHYLLINE: The fluoroquinolones differ in the amount of which they impair the elimination of Theophylline and other Methylxanthines. The mechanism is thought to involve the cytochrome p450 1A2 enzyme. Ciprofloxacin, by reducing metabolism by 30%, can increase theophylline serum levels by 20%to 90%. Norfloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, lomefloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin show no significant increase in theophylline levels. WARFARIN:
Many of the fluoroquinolones have been associated with an increasing in
PT/INR when patients are taking warfarin. This is a serious reaction and
patients on warfarin should be monitored when prescribed a fluoroquinolone.
ACHILLES TENDONITIS: Both the older and newer fluoroquinolones have been associated with arthropathy in weight bearing joints. Studies have shown erosion and permanent lesions of the cartilage due to quinolone use in animals. Although Achilles tendon rupture has been the most common injury with over 200 cases reported other joints may also be affected. Injury has been noted up to 90 days out after completion of therapy. Due to the affect on cartilage, fluoroquinolones are contraindicated in pregnant or nursing mothers and children under the age of 18.(15) CARDIAC: QT prolongation is thought to be due to a halogen substitution at the number 8 position. Moxifloxacin's prescribing information warns against its use in patients: taking other drugs that may cause QT prolongation, taking anti-arrhythmics, or have hypokalemia. Similar warnings are also present for gatifloxacin and sparfloxacin although there is not a halogen in the R8 position. Torsades de pointes was associated with ciprofloxacin less than levofloxacin or gatifloxacin. Occurrence rates are 0.3, 5.4 and 27 respectively per 10 million prescriptions, which was significant. Levofloxacin and gatifloxacin should be used with caution in-patient with risk of QT prolongation. GASTROINTESTINAL:
With all of the fluoroquinolones the most common side effects are nausea,
vomiting and diarrhea, with an occurrence rate ranging from 3% to 17%.(15,18,23)
CRYSTALURIA: Crystaluria has been associated with the fluoroquinolones, except levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin. Patients should be instructed to drink plenty of water to avoid this occurrence.(15,23,18) LIVER TOXICITY: In an 18-month post approval follow up study by the FDA for trovafloxacin 140 cases of liver toxicity were found. Due to these findings trovafloxacin's use is limited to hospitalized patients with life or limb threatening diseases.(8) PHOTOTOXICITY:
Phototoxicity has been reported and most likely to occur in ciprofloxacin,
lomefloxacin and norfloxacin.
Resistance (14-16) Resistance develops to fluoroquinolones due to three possible mechanisms; alterations in topoisomerase enzymes, decreased permeability and efflux mechanisms. No quinolone-degrading enzyme has been identified. Resistance patterns have been show in strains of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Campylobacter jejuni; Burkholderia cepacia; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Staphylococcus aureus (especially oxacillin-resistant strains); Enterococcus faecium; and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Resistance to one quinolone usually confers resistance to the entire class. It has been shown that when there is a methyl or methoxy group in position number eight the topoisomerase enzymes must undergo mutations in two sights for there to be an effect on binding affinity.(23) Treatment Recommendations (2-12,20,23) ACUTE SINUSITIS: Acute sinusitis is often due to allergic or viral conditions. Due to this, antibiotic therapy should be implemented in patients who have received analgesics and decongestants for 7 days, who have facial pain and purulent discharge. In this case fluoroquinolones are second line agents. If the infection is severe levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin should be used. LOWER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONS: For treatment of mild/moderate cases of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), antimicrobial treatment is controversial. For the treatment of severe cases of AECB it is recommended that the fluoroquinolones with enhanced activity against resistant S. pneumoniae be used (levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, trovafloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin). Several other first line agents exist: azithromycin or clarithromycin, oral cephlosporins, or amoxicillin/clavulanate. For non-hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to S. pneumoniae, H. influenza, M. catarrhalis, S. aureus, mycoplasma, and chlamydia, fluoroquinolones with a greater affect against S. pneumoniae are recommended (levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxin) as second line agents. First line treatment for this condition is usually azithromycin, or clarithromycin. Other second line agents are oral cephlosporins, amoxicillin/clavulanate or doxycycline. However, in hospitalized patients with CAP, the fluoroquinolones are first line agents. Ciprofloxacin along with piperacillin/tazobactam is indicated as a first line treatment for nosocomial pneumoniae. INFECTIOUS DIARRHEA: Cipro can be used for infectious diarrhea due to shigella, salmonella, C jejuni, E.coli, c. difficile, or E. histolytica. If recent antibiotic therapy has been noted, and c. difficile toxin colitis is possible, either metronidazole or vancomycin should be used in conjunction with ciprofloxacin. A second line alternative in infectious diarrhea is TMP/SMX DS. UTI: Urinary tract infections are most commonly due to E. coli. This organism has a resistance rate to SMX/TMP of 18%. This has made the fluoroquinolones the first line treatment in empiric treatment of UTIs much of the time. The fluoroquinolones also possess a broader spectrum than SMX/TMP.(19) The Infectious Disease Society of America still recommends SMX/TMP as a first line agent in uncomplicated UTIs. In a cost minimization analysis study it was determined that empirical treatment of UTI with a fluoroquinolone first line was more cost effective when the rate of bacterial resistance to SMX/TMP was 22%.(21) SEXUALLY
TRANSMITTED DISEASES (STDs):
Either doxycycline or azithromycin are used as first line agents in chlamydia.
Either a fluoroquinolone (ofloxacin) or erythromycin base can be used
as a second line agent. For STDs due to N. gonorrhea either cephlosporins,
ciprofloxin or ofloxacin are first line agents. It is estimated that 50%
of patients with N. gonorrhea infection are also infected with
C. trachomatis. Emperic treatment should therefore be aimed at
both by adding either doxycycline or azithromycin to a fluoroquinolone
or cephlosporins.
Although many head to head trials have been conducted with the fluoroquinolones there is not enough evidence to determine if one drug is better than another within its given indication. Choices should therefore be made on culture and sensitivity, when available, then pharmacokinetic and safety profile. There are basically two groups within the fluoroquinolones: the first are those with mainly gram-negative coverage used for UTIs. Norfloxacin, lomefloxacin, ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin are included in this group. Both Norfloxacin and lomefloxacin have limited indications. Ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin both have a wider list of indications. Ciprofloxacin is most notably used for its coverage against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Its use is limited in the case of CAP due to ciprofloxacin resistant strains of streptococcus and pneumococcal pneumoniae. Phototoxicity is more likely to occur with norfloxacin, lomefloxacin and ciprofloxacin. CNS toxicity has been reported most frequently with norfloxacin. QT prolongation has been associated with the fluoroquinolones but the risk is much less in this group than with the later generations. Each of these four fluoroquinolones is dosed twice daily and must be taken on an empty stomach. One exception is in the case of ofloxacin where the affect of food on absorption has not yet been studied. The later generations have an extended half-life, less CNS toxicity, a broader spectrum including gram-positive bacteria and some anaerobes. This group is comprised of levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin. Moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin both have the potential to decrease bacterial resistance due to its increased binding affinity. Moxifloxacin has been highly associated with QT prolongation, but to a lesser extent with phototoxicity. No dosage adjustments are required for moxifloxacin for patients with renal impairment. Gatifloxacin is highly bioavailable and has been less associated with QT prolongation and phototoxicity. Levofloxacin is the active L isomer of Ofloxacin. It has a broad spectrum and a good side effect profile with no QT prolongation warning (although cases have been reported), and a decreased probability of causing phototoxic reactions. Sparfloxacin has unreliable coverage in some areas. It has also been associated with QT prolongation and phototoxicity. Trovafloxacin's use is restricted to hospitalized patients with threat of loss of life or limb. This restriction was placed because of its association with liver failure. It does have great anaerobic coverage similar to metronidazole except for Clostridium difficile. Summary and Recommendations Supportive rational is not seen for, lomefloxacin, sparfloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin, based on spectrum, safety and kinetic profile, in the clinical setting. Of the second-generation drugs, ciprofloxacin is necessary for its superior coverage of pseudomonas aeruginosa and it's broad list of indications. Ofloxacin's coverage of atypical pathogens and safety regarding QT prolongation makes the drug very favorable. Norfloxacin may be an alternative within its limited indications. Of the fluoroquinolones with extended spectrum for gram-positive pathogens both sparfloxacin and moxifloxacin have safety profiles concerning QT prolongation. Levofloxacin and gatifloxacin are both viable options.
1) Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacologic Basis of Therapeutics, Ninth Edition. 1065-1067. 2) Noroxin (norfloxacin) package insert. Merck 3) Cipro (ciprofloxacin) package insert. Bayer 4) Floxin (ofloxacin) package insert. Ortho-McNeil 5) Penetrex ( enoxacin) package insert. Aventis Pharmaceuticals 6) Maxequin ( lomefloxacin) package insert. Searle 7) Levaquin (levofloxacin) package insert. Ortho-Mcneil 8) Zagam (sparfloxacin) package insert. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer 9) Trovan (trovafloxacin) package insert. 10) Tequin (gatifloxacin) package insert. Bristol-Myers Squibb. 11) Avelox (moxifloxacin) package insert. Bayer 12) King DE, et al. New Classification and Update on the Quinolone Antibiotics. American Family Physician. 2000: 61:2741-8. 13) O'Donnell JA. Fluoroquinolones. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. Jun 1, 2000:13(2):489-513. 14) Owens RC, Ambrose PG. Antibiotic therapy, Clinical use of the Fluoroquinolones. Medical Clinics of North America. November 2000;84(6):1447-1469. 15) Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 5th ed., 2000 Churchill Livingstone, Inc. 404-419. 16) Maryam B., et al. The newer fluoroquinolones: A review of their properties. Emergency medicine WWW.emedmag.com. 17) CDC Factsheet - Quinolones, Quinolones and the clinical laboratory. 18) Frothingham R. Rates of Torsades de pointes Associated with Ciprofloxacin, Ofloxacin, Levofloxacin, Gatifloxacin and Moxifloxacin. Pharmacotherapy 2001:12:1468-1472. 19) Birnbaumer D. Fernandez-Frackelton M. Pharmacologic advances in Emergency Medicine; The New Antibiotics. Emergency Medicial Clinics of North America - Nov. 1, 2000:18(4):671-708. 20) Gilbert DN, et al. The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy 2001, Thirty first edition. 21) Lee TP, Miller LG. Empirical therapy for uncomplicated UTI in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance: a decision and cost analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Sep 1, 2001 33(5):615-21. 22) Martin SJ, Meyer JM, Chuck SK, et al: Levofloxacin and sparfloxacin: New quinolone antibiotics. Ann Pharmacotherapy 1998:32:320-336. 23) Hedge DD. Steps forward and backward with in the Fluoroquinolone class. South Dakota Journal of Medicine. April 2000:53 (4):137. 24) 2001 Drug Topics Red Book, Pharmacy's Fundamental Reference. October 2001 update. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pharmacy
home | Drug
Info & Policy Eval © Copyright 2002 Oregon State University |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||